Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2026 (Vins Rouges & Blancs)
Date :
May 22, 2026
Number of judges :
6
Nationality of tasters :
South Africa
1
Japan
1
Italy
1
Spain
1
Belgium
1
Armenia
1
Results
Silver medal
Tasting notes
The nose has hints of unripe pear and apple, with a touch of melon. Fresh and elegant on the palate, with a subtle finish that delicately expresses the fruit's frankness.
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
16
(84%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
3
(16%)
Qualitative summary
Freshness
Very frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
4 /5
80 %
Not described
1 /5
20 %
Most used descriptors
present
3
very important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Very frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
4 /5
80 %
Not described
1 /5
20 %
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
2
very drinkable
1
modern
1
subtle / filigree-like
1
very friendly / pleasant
1
friendly / pleasant
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Frequently described
Rather low quality

Poor
2 /5
40 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important
1
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Acidity
Moderately described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
excessive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Minerality
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Smoothness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Salinity
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
mouth-watering
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Complexity
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace