Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2026 (Vins Rouges & Blancs)
Date :
May 22, 2026
Number of judges :
5
Nationality of tasters :
Hungary
1
Georgia
1
France
1
Denmark
1
China
1
Results
Although not a medal winner, this wine received the CMB MERIT. This label certifies that it achieved a minimum score of 86/100, a guarantee of remarkable quality validated by a jury of international experts.
Score obtained :
88.4
/ 100
Tasting notes
Elegant nose with aromas of candied pear, green apple and white flowers. Pleasant and fresh on the palate, supported by well-integrated acidity.
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
20
(69%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
9
(31%)
Qualitative summary
Balance
Very frequently described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
4 /5
High quality
3 /5
Low quality
1 /5
60%
20%
Most used descriptors
Nice balance
2
Important
1
Insufficient
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Very frequently described
Rather low quality
Comments with average high or low quality
3 /5
High quality
1 /5
Low quality
2 /5
20%
40%
Most used descriptors
Moderately important
2
Important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Very frequently described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
3 /5
High quality
3 /5
Low quality
0 /5
60%
0%
Most used descriptors
Elegant / pleasant
3
Authentic
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Complexity
Frequently described
Non-consensual quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /5
High quality
1 /5
Low quality
1 /5
20%
20%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Insufficient
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Elegance
Frequently described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /5
High quality
2 /5
Low quality
0 /5
40%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Acidity
Frequently described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /5
High quality
2 /5
Low quality
0 /5
40%
0%
Most used descriptors
Nice acidity
1
Well balanced / integrated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Frequently described
Rather low quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /5
High quality
0 /5
Low quality
2 /5
0%
40%
Most used descriptors
Slightly important
2
Moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Softness
Frequently described
Non-consensual quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /5
High quality
1 /5
Low quality
1 /5
20%
20%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Frequently described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
2 /5
High quality
2 /5
Low quality
0 /5
40%
0%
Most used descriptors
Present
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Smoothness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /5
High quality
1 /5
Low quality
0 /5
20%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Delicacy
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /5
High quality
1 /5
Low quality
0 /5
20%
0%
Most used descriptors
Important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Body
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /5
High quality
1 /5
Low quality
0 /5
20%
0%
Most used descriptors
Well balanced / integrated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Sapidity
Moderately described
Rather low quality
Comments with average high or low quality
1 /5
High quality
0 /5
Low quality
1 /5
0%
20%
Most used descriptors
Moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace