Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2026 (Vins Effervescents)
Date :
May 22, 2026
Number of judges :
6
Nationality of tasters :
Romania
1
Portugal
1
Kazakhstan
1
Italy
1
Germany
1
Armenia
1
Results
Although not a medal winner, this wine received the CMB MERIT. This label certifies that it achieved a minimum score of 86/100, a guarantee of remarkable quality validated by a jury of international experts.
Score obtained :
87.6
/ 100
Tasting notes
Pineapple, mango and fresh white peach on the nose. Elegant on the palate, with a lovely freshness and minerality. A frank and pleasant wine.
Dominant aromas
aromatic herb, spearmint, leaf
Williams pear, green apple
apricot, white peach
Main characteristics
Very intense
Very intense
Very intense
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
17
(94%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
1
(6%)
Qualitative summary
Overall quality
Frequently described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
1 /6
17 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
3 /6
50 %
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
2
technical
1
juicy / crunchy
1
friendly / convivial
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Minerality
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
present
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Softness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
important
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important
1
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
nice freshness
1
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
important
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Roundness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important (aromas)
1
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Elegance
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Taste profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Data analyzed by Winespace