Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2026 (Vins Effervescents)
Date :
May 22, 2026
Number of judges :
6
Nationality of tasters :
Romania
1
Portugal
1
Kazakhstan
1
Italy
1
Germany
1
Armenia
1
Results
Silver medal
Tasting notes
A straightforward nose with citrus aromas of tangerine and grapefruit, with a hint of peach. On the palate, the wine's fine effervescence, minerality and salinity give it a lively quality.
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
12
(57%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
9
(43%)
Qualitative summary
Overall quality
Very frequently described
Rather low quality

Poor
3 /6
50 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
2 /6
33 %
Most used descriptors
not exuberant
1
dry / astringent
1
tight
1
elegant / pleasant
1
very simple
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Minerality
Frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
3 /6
50 %
Not described
3 /6
50 %
Most used descriptors
present
3
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Acidity
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
slightly balanced / integrated
1
nice acidity
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
nice length
1
moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important
1
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Pearl-like eff.
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
1
aggressive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Effervescence
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
nice effervescence
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Salinity
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Complexity
Seldom described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
0 /6
0 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace