Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2026 (Vins Effervescents)
Date :
May 22, 2026
Number of judges :
5
Nationality of tasters :
Russian Federation
1
Portugal
1
Italy
1
Finland
1
Brazil
1
Results
Although not a medal winner, this wine received the CMB MERIT. This label certifies that it achieved a minimum score of 86/100, a guarantee of remarkable quality validated by a jury of international experts.
Score obtained :
86.7
/ 100
Tasting notes
The nose has aromas of apple blossom and orange blossom. Smooth on the palate, with refreshing acidity and a refined texture. The finish unfolds grapefruit and floral notes.
Dominant aromas
apple, melon, pear
grapefruit, lime
apple blossom, orange blossom
Main characteristics
Very intense
Very intense
Slightly intense
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
7
(58%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
5
(42%)
Qualitative summary
Length
Frequently described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important
1
persistent
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Frequently described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
2 /5
40 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
present (aromas)
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Frequently described
Rather low quality
Poor
2 /5
40 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
moderately important (aromas)
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Acidity
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
fresh / refreshing
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Unctuousness
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
nice unctuousness
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Body
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
1 /5
20 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
light
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Elegance
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
refined / distinguished
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Moderately described
Rather low quality
Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
simple
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important (acidity vs residual sugar)
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Taste profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Data analyzed by Winespace