Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2025 (Vins doux & fortifiés)
Date :
September 16, 2025
Number of judges :
10
Nationality of tasters :
France
3
Italy
2
Mexico
1
Ireland
1
Hungary
1
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1
Finland
1
Results
Unfortunately, this reference did not receive a medal at this edition.
Score obtained :
88.6
/ 100
Tasting notes
The complex nose reveals aromas of grape and apple, enriched by hints of muscat and orange blossom. On the palate, the wine is well structured and harmoniously balanced, but the somewhat pronounced alcohol detracts from the overall impression. The finish is not as long as it could be.
Dominant aromas
apple, grape
muscat
lemon
Main characteristics
Very slightly intense
Very intense
Slightly intense
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
3
(30%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
7
(70%)
Qualitative summary
Length
Very frequently described
Rather low quality
Poor
3 /5
60 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
2 /5
40 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
insufficient
1
moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Alcohol
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
well balanced / integrated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Rather low quality
Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important (aromas)
1
moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Consistency
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Body
Moderately described
Rather low quality
Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
lean
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather low quality
Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Taste profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Data analyzed by Winespace