Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2025 (Vins Effervescents)
Date :
September 05, 2025
Number of judges :
6
Nationality of tasters :
Norway
1
North Macedonia
1
Moldova, Republic of
1
Italy
1
France
1
Belgium
1
Results
Gold medal
Tasting notes
The very fresh nose reveals intense floral notes accompanied by lemon and subtle hints of English candy. The pleasant palate reveals a lovely acidic freshness, culminating in an elegant finish.
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
17
(89%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
2
(11%)
Qualitative summary
Overall quality
Very frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
1 /6
17 %
Good
4 /6
67 %
Not described
1 /6
17 %
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
3
tasty
1
surprising
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Very frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
4 /6
67 %
Not described
2 /6
33 %
Most used descriptors
present
3
very important
1
refreshing
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Acidity
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
fresh / refreshing
1
juicy / crunchy
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Seldom described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
0 /6
0 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Tension
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
nice tension
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Finesse
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Character
Seldom described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
0 /6
0 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Seldom described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace