Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2025 (Vins Effervescents)
Date :
September 05, 2025
Number of judges :
5
Nationality of tasters :
Moldova, Republic of
1
Denmark
1
Germany
1
Belgium
1
Australia
1
Results
Silver medal
Tasting notes
The nose reveals aromas of pear and green apple, enhanced by notes of hazelnut, almond and white flowers. On the palate, this wine is beautifully fresh and full-bodied, balanced and elegant. Only the length is insufficient.
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
10
(83%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
2
(17%)
Qualitative summary
Length
Very frequently described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
1 /4
25 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
2 /4
50 %
Not described
1 /4
25 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
moderately important
1
nice length
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Roundness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
1 /4
25 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /4
25 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
0 /4
0 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important (aromas)
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Bubble
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
1 /4
25 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
fine / delicate
1
well balanced / integrated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Salinity
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
1 /4
25 %
Good
0 /4
0 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
salty
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Structure
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
1 /4
25 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
nice structure
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
1 /4
25 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
1 /4
25 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
successful / accomplished
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /4
0 %
Average
0 /4
0 %
Good
1 /4
25 %
Not described
3 /4
75 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace