Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2025 (Vins Rouges & Blancs)
Date :
June 10, 2025
Number of judges :
6
Nationality of tasters :
United States of America
1
Hungary
1
France
1
Germany
1
China
1
Belgium
1
Results
Gold medal
Tasting notes
A complex bouquet of intense blackberry and elegant pepper notes, enhanced by hints of vanilla and toast. Animal and mushroom nuances add depth, while laurel and cut grass add a vegetal dimension. On the palate, the fullness and freshness are elegantly felt.
Dominant aromas
plum
blackberry
Main characteristics
Intense
Intense
Intense
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
11
(69%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
5
(31%)
Qualitative summary
Tannin
Frequently described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
3 /6
50 %
Most used descriptors
hard / rough
1
well integrated / melted
1
well balanced / integrated
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Breadth
Moderately described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
2 /6
33 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
important
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality
Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
4 /6
67 %
Most used descriptors
hard / rough
1
incisive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Alcohol
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
0 /6
0 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
excessive
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Body
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Smoothness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
nice length
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Complexity
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Fatness
Seldom described
Rather high quality
Poor
0 /6
0 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
1 /6
17 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Seldom described
Rather low quality
Poor
1 /6
17 %
Average
0 /6
0 %
Good
0 /6
0 %
Not described
5 /6
83 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Taste profile
  • PNG
    Standard
  • PNG HD
    High definition
  • SVG
    Vector file
Data analyzed by Winespace