Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2025 (Vins Rouges & Blancs)
Date :
June 10, 2025
Number of judges :
5
Nationality of tasters :
Slovenia
1
Portugal
1
Germany
1
China
1
Belgium
1
Results
Silver medal
Tasting notes
A seductive bouquet dominated by lemon, accompanied by exotic and floral notes of elderberry. Intense freshness is combined with a lovely fullness, offering a balance between liveliness and roundness. Elegant minerality and remarkable length sublimate this envelopingly supple wine, with a subtle touch of cut grass and sweetness.
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
14
(88%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
2
(13%)
Qualitative summary
Overall quality
Very frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
3 /5
60 %
Not described
2 /5
40 %
Most used descriptors
elegant / pleasant
2
easy to drink
1
linear
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
2 /5
40 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
refreshing
2
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Unctuousness
Frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
2 /5
40 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
important
2
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Body
Frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
1 /5
20 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
round / coated
1
light
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Acidity
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
lively / tonic
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Length
Moderately described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Volume
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
nice volume
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Moderately described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
moderately important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Liveliness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace