Tasting
Competition :
Concours mondial de Bruxelles 2024 (Vins Effervescents)
Date :
July 03, 2024
Number of judges :
5
Nationality of tasters :
Italy
1
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1
France
1
Germany
1
Canada
1
Results
Silver medal
Dominant aromas
Main characteristics
Qualitative balance
Percentage of quoted strengths
Number of quoted strengths
12
(67%)
Number of quoted weaknesses
6
(33%)
Qualitative summary
Length
Very frequently described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
2 /5
40 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
2 /5
40 %
Most used descriptors
slightly important
2
persistent
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Freshness
Frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
2 /5
40 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
present (aromas)
1
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Expressiveness
Frequently described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
slightly deep
1
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Cleanness
Frequently described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
2 /5
40 %
Not described
3 /5
60 %
Most used descriptors
important (aromas)
1
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Bitterness
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
1 /5
20 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
present
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Breadth
Moderately described
Non-consensual quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
1 /5
20 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
insufficient
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Smoothness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Density
Moderately described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
insufficient
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Bubble
Moderately described
Rather low quality

Poor
1 /5
20 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
0 /5
0 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
hard / rough
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Unctuousness
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
nice unctuousness
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Elegance
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Overall quality
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
easy to drink
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
Balance
Moderately described
Rather high quality

Poor
0 /5
0 %
Average
0 /5
0 %
Good
1 /5
20 %
Not described
4 /5
80 %
Most used descriptors
important
1
Some comments may show multiple descriptors
See more
Aromatic profile
Taste profile
Data analyzed by Winespace